“Neil (Abercrombie) promised me that when he became governor he was going to cut through all the red tape,” Evans said. “He was going to get Obama's birth certificate once and for all and end this stupid controversy…Yesterday talking to Neil's office, Neil said that he searched everywhere using his power as governor… There is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii, absolutely no proof at all that he was born in Hawaii. Now he went out, he loves Obama, he purposely did this to get rid of that question -- now got some egg in the face, now he admit
The radio host asks: “Mike how hard would it be to go back and find out what doctors were on then?”
Evans answers: “Well apparently he can't find any of that."
The reason no hospital records exist fom that time is because, lets say he was born in Indonesia when they arrived back in Hawaii all they needed to do was go to the hospital and ask for a record of live birth. At that time people still had alot of babies at home etc. That could be why he has a record but no birth certificate from a hospital
ReplyDeleteIn an attempt to end the "birther" myth that President Obama was not born in the United States (and thus not qualified to serve as president), five Democrats on the Hawaii state legislature have introduced a bill that would allow anyone to obtain a copy of President Obama's birth records for a $100 fee.
ReplyDelete"... a state privacy law that limits the release of state birth records to those with a tangible interest in the matter"
ReplyDeleteI guess that the fact he is the sitting President of the US and that one of the requirements is that he is a natural born citizen of the US, and that he signs laws that affects every citizens of the US, and that he can command citizens to go to war and possibly die in battle, that US citizens do not have a tangible interest. How in hell can Hawaii say that any US citizen does not have a tangible interest?
I think there is enough here to warrant a raised eyebrow. Add this to the millions in legal fees he has spent to block access to his College Transcripts and past passports and if you aren't suspicious you probably are a sheep.
ReplyDeleteIf you can express the loss of the US Citizen in Dollars and Cents, then it's tangible ( $100 ).
ReplyDeleteIf you can express the loss to a US Citizen in terms of Love of Country, Duty, Honor, etc then it's an intangible and priceless...
Tangible interest is narrowly defined in Hawaii law (§338-18 Disclosure of records. ) as someone who is ;
ReplyDelete1) The registrant; (2) The spouse of the registrant; (3) A parent of the registrant; (4) A descendant of the registrant; (5) A person having a common ancestor with the registrant; (6) A legal guardian of the registrant; (7) A person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant; (8) A personal representative of the registrant's estate; (9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction; (10) Adoptive parents who have filed a petition for adoption and who need to determine the death of one or more of the prospective adopted child's natural or legal parents; (11) A person who needs to determine the marital status of a former spouse in order to determine the payment of alimony; (12) A person who needs to determine the death of a nonrelated co-owner of property purchased under a joint tenancy agreement; and (13) A person who needs a death certificate for the determination of payments under a credit insurance policy.
Attempts to see whatever documentation exists under reason 9 have been denied, as far as i know. My main question is in line with what other have said, when combined with the Obama campaign efforts to obscure, conceal, or prevent disclosure of ANY pertient records, it causes me to question why? Most politicians fully disclose records of employment, school records, etc...yet Obama didn't. Why?
When it was questioned if John McCain was eligible he presented his legal copy birth certificate. Thanks for the extra info, I was just going by the news article I read. I guess you heard that Terry Lakin was denied his motion to present evidence in his defence (that the court issue a summons for the birth certificate) and was court martial. Terry was just shy five years (more or less) of retirement.and the court stripped him of his retirement.
ReplyDeleteTerry Lakin presented a fake birth certificate in his defense. His entire defense was based on that fake document. The sad part is so many people read the document and believed it was real without noticing that the Birth Certificate Lakin presented was dated before Kenya was born. Sad really, that so many over look the obvious in their quest for detailed information.
ReplyDeleteAnd please, stop suing the President in my name, as if that gives you standing. First, figure out exactly what your material loss is, then present it to a court to establish your own standing. Being upset, or feeling disenfranchised does not count as standing, it's the appropriate emotion that accompanies losers in defeat....