Popular Posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

What is going on

 The National Memorial Cemetery of Arizona is a beautiful 225 acre facility located in Phoenix. A usually quiet U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Cemetery, it has been unusually active lately. Starting in mid February 2009, and continuing since then, from early hours of the morning until sunset, a massive construction operation has been underway. Major amounts of earth have been excavated  about 9-10 feet deep and 600-1000 feet wide. There are multiple locations on the property like this.Crushed rock covers the base of the excavation, while large tractor trailer loads of in ground vaults are brought into place side by side, then covered with the concrete lids and backfilled to look as if nothing is there. Crushed rock is put in place under the burial vaults for good drainage and solid bedding. This will help not contaminate ground water sources.

No one is saying why the cemetary is being prepared to accomodate an additional 40,000 bodies. At least thats what Infowars and Alex Jones are reporting.

The VA had done a similar project between 1998-2001 to upgrade the facility to accomodate all burial needs projected until 2030.

UPDATE: Reports of other VA cemetaries, in Indiana near Chicago, outside Houston, Denver, and other large metro areas..all undergoing mass grave construction, in preparation for what???

Lets think the unthinkable...massive deaths by pandemic (natural or manmade), nuclear destruction by a small tactical nuke, or anticipation for future demand based on some weird hidden agenda?

 

What is going on

The National Memorial Cemetery of Arizona is a beautiful 225 acre facility located in Phoenix. A usually quiet U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Cemetery, it has been unusually active lately. Starting in mid February 2009, and continuing since then, from early hours of the morning until sunset, a massive construction operation has been underway. Major amounts of earth have been excavated about 9-10 feet deep and 600-1000 feet wide. There are multiple locations on the property like this.Crushed rock covers the base of the excavation, while large tractor trailer loads of in ground vaults are brought into place side by side, then covered with the concrete lids and backfilled to look as if nothing is there. Crushed rock is put in place under the burial vaults for good drainage and solid bedding. This will help not contaminate ground water sources.

No one is saying why the cemetary is being prepared to accomodate an additional 40,000 bodies. At least thats what Infowars and Alex Jones are reporting.

No More Term Limit for President?

Bills that must NOT become law:

 

House Joint Resolution 5

Introduced January 2009

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’.

 Wow….no term limits…eight years is enough for anyone…this is mindboggling

 

HR 45 The Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 -

 

Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this Act (or a state system certified under this Act) and such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Prescribes license application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
Prohibits transferring or receiving a qualifying firearm unless the recipient presents a valid firearms license, the license is verified, and the dealer records a tracking authorization number. Prescribes firearms transfer reporting and record keeping requirements. Directs the Attorney General to establish and maintain a federal record of sale system.
Prohibits:
(1) transferring a firearm to any person other than a licensee, unless the transfer is processed through a licensed dealer in accordance with national instant criminal background check system requirements, with exceptions;
(2) a licensed manufacturer or dealer from failing to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements of this Act;
(3) failing to report the loss or theft of the firearm to the Attorney General within 72 hours;
(4) failing to report to the Attorney General an address change within 60 days; or
(5) keeping a loaded firearm, or an unloaded firearm and ammunition for the firearm, knowingly or recklessly disregarding the risk that a child is capable of gaining access, if a child uses the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury.

Prescribes criminal penalties for violations of firearms provisions covered by this Act.
Directs the Attorney General to:
(1) establish and maintain a firearm injury information clearinghouse;
(2) conduct continuing studies and investigations of firearm-related deaths and injuries; and
(3) collect and maintain current production and sales figures of each licensed manufacturer.
Authorizes the Attorney General to certify state firearm licensing or record of sale systems.

California has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country. Among these is a law that purchasers of handguns must acquire a handgun license, essentially a certificate that you know the gun laws and have demonstrated in a practical exam proscribed by the state and usually administered by the gun shop. This is on top of the required background check and mandated 15 day waiting period, enacted because in the past someone bought a gun and then when on a shooting spree. Never mind that a committed wacko would wait the 15 days anyway…and some have.

Prohibition 1 would usurp California law in that families can routinely transfer arms between father or mother to children, either by direct giving or via heirloom provisions of a will; Prohibition 5 is also already law. Prohibitions 2, 3 and 4 would federalize authority currently exercised by the states and local communities, adding another layer of bureaucracy. Local agencies already enter stolen firearms into a national database, via the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. I know because I used to make those entries when I was working for a police department.

Now the federal government wants to institute a system, well, its looks bad to me.

 

I don’t want to sound paranoid, but this sounds like setting up a system so that if the government wants to round up all the guns, and maybe all the gun owners, it would have the ability to do so, without conferring with the states or local authorities.

 

If you are thinking about the connection between these proposals, think like an Obamabot. What would be better than having him as president for life, and his Attorney general have the power to determine who should or shouldn’t have the right to own a firearm? Not a handgun, we’re talking any firearm, from a single shot target rifle on up. Then we (Obamaistas) can takeaway free speech, we’ll bailout out the newspapers only if they print what we want…etc, etc, etc.  

No More Term Limit for President?

Bills that must NOT become law:

House Joint Resolution 5

Introduced January 2009

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’.

Wow….no term limits…eight years is enough for anyone…this is mindboggling

HR 45 The Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 -

Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this Act (or a state system certified under this Act) and such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Prescribes license application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
Prohibits transferring or receiving a qualifying firearm unless the recipient presents a valid firearms license, the license is verified, and the dealer records a tracking authorization number. Prescribes firearms transfer reporting and record keeping requirements. Directs the Attorney General to establish and maintain a federal record of sale system.
Prohibits:
(1) transferring a firearm to any person other than a licensee, unless the transfer is processed through a licensed dealer in accordance with national instant criminal background check system requirements, with exceptions;
(2) a licensed manufacturer or dealer from failing to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements of this Act;
(3) failing to report the loss or theft of the firearm to the Attorney General within 72 hours;
(4) failing to report to the Attorney General an address change within 60 days; or
(5) keeping a loaded firearm, or an unloaded firearm and ammunition for the firearm, knowingly or recklessly disregarding the risk that a child is capable of gaining access, if a child uses the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury.

Prescribes criminal penalties for violations of firearms provisions covered by this Act.
Directs the Attorney General to:
(1) establish and maintain a firearm injury information clearinghouse;
(2) conduct continuing studies and investigations of firearm-related deaths and injuries; and
(3) collect and maintain current production and sales figures of each licensed manufacturer.
Authorizes the Attorney General to certify state firearm licensing or record of sale systems.

California has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country. Among these is a law that purchasers of handguns must acquire a handgun license, essentially a certificate that you know the gun laws and have demonstrated in a practical exam proscribed by the state and usually administered by the gun shop. This is on top of the required background check and mandated 15 day waiting period, enacted because in the past someone bought a gun and then when on a shooting spree. Never mind that a committed wacko would wait the 15 days anyway…and some have.

Prohibition 1 would usurp California law in that families can routinely transfer arms between father or mother to children, either by direct giving or via heirloom provisions of a will; Prohibition 5 is also already law. Prohibitions 2, 3 and 4 would federalize authority currently exercised by the states and local communities, adding another layer of bureaucracy. Local agencies already enter stolen firearms into a national database, via the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. I know because I used to make those entries when I was working for a police department.

Now the federal government wants to institute a system, well, its looks bad to me.

I don’t want to sound paranoid, but this sounds like setting up a system so that if the government wants to round up all the guns, and maybe all the gun owners, it would have the ability to do so, without conferring with the states or local authorities.

If you are thinking about the connection between these proposals, think like an Obamabot. What would be better than having him as president for life, and his Attorney general have the power to determine who should or shouldn’t have the right to own a firearm? Not a handgun, we’re talking any firearm, from a single shot target rifle on up. Then we (Obamaistas) can takeaway free speech, we’ll bailout out the newspapers only if they print what we want…etc, etc, etc.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Obama Deception

After watching the whole 1 hour and 53 minutes, I can only say I am sad...because nothing really shocked me.

I didnt vote for BO (shock) because I thought him a phony early on, and voted for someone else in the primary; then saw a piece about his political life just starting from nowhere when some Chicago political bosses agreed to get him elected. I knew then he was bought and paid for. By whom i didnt know till now.

I had already known of the 20,000 uniformed troops being assigned  inside the United States by 2011 being trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials. There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement.

I might add that one weekend I combed the weband found the Northern Command breakdown of the troops, and then wondered why a combat aviation unit was being rotated from Afghanistan to this unit...I mean they have combat helicopters, not troop carriers or even Blackhawks. We're talking Apache gunships...and the ground troops are a unit that has done a lot of house to house comabt in Iraq,,,maybe its just my paranoia, but that dont seem like what you would assign to help the police. I would think a lot of Military Police would be what that would call for, after all, they are trained cops..one of my cousins was a mp and then became a cop where he lives, says it was just a change in uniform and locale.

I had to research Presidential Directive 51, and found that it is National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (National Security Presidential Directive NSPD 51/Homeland Security Presidential Directive HSPD-20) and basically says when the president considers an emergency to have occurred, an "Enduring Constitutional Government" comprising "a cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government, coordinated by the President," will take the place of the nation's regular government ", presumably without the oversight of Congress. Conservative activist Jerome Corsi and Marjorie Cohn of theNational Lawyers Guild have said that this is a violation of the Constitution of the United States ...The directive, created by the president, claims that the president has the power to declare a catastrophic emergency. It does not specify who has the power to declare the emergency over.."

"No government deprives its citizens of rights without asserting that its actions are "reasonable" and "necessary" for high-sounding reasons such as "public safety." A right that can be regulated is no right at all, only a temporary privilege dependent upon the good will of the very government officials that such right is designed to constrain."

I've had enough..

I've had enough, and I'm not going to take it anymore... there is no transparency in this government, except the  transparency that is revealing the truth, peeling away layer after layer of incompetent bungling of our money, or future, our very constitution...need more evidence??

Watch...even if you dont own a firearm, remember why the founders of this country thought it important...as a symbol that the people hold all power, and government serves the people..not the other way around.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Grassfires.org

 

http://grassfire.org/

My friend posted this and I am spreading the word...we need to be involved  

canice on IMEEM

http://www.imeem.com/people/BDbfAhE
This is where I store most of my online music...mostly stuff from 1960's and some newer, maybe some classical...

Wilhelm Kempff plays Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata mvt. 1




ACTA

Since 2007 the US has been in secret negotiations to enact the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The proposed trade accord would criminalize peer-to-peer file sharing, subject iPods to border searches and allow internet service providers to monitor their customers' communications. The Bush administration has refused to shed any light on these negotiations. 

President Barack Obama came into office in January promising a new era of openness.

The White House this week declared the text of the proposed treaty a "properly classified" national security secret, in rejecting a Freedom of Information Act request "Please be advised the documents you seek are being withheld in full," wrote the chief FOIA officer in the White House's Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

The national security claim is stunning, given that the treaty negotiations have included the 27 member states of the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Switzerland and New Zealand, all of whom presumably have access to the "classified" information.

Attorney General Eric Holder told senators that the Obama administration would review litigation inherited from the Bush administration in which the so-called state-secrets privilege was invoked. Despite the review, the Obama administration is not deviating from its predecessor.

Won't get fooled again my [expletive deleted]! More like duped!

Sunday March 29, 2009

Religion is a very personal topic for me. I try to live by a moral code that is based in my families teachings from our faith. I also try to be non-judgemental, and believe that what ever you believe is simply that, what you believe.

In college, i decided i was not going to believe in god anymore, and had a real challenge to my faith. i decided to take some class in comparative religion, and it was very interesting, to find there are many common features to most of the prevailing religions in the world. Of the 21 faith or beliefs systems that dominate our planet, there is a common Ethic of Reciprocity. The most commonly known version in North America is the Golden Rule of Christianity. It is often expressed as "Do onto others as you would wish them do onto you." There is no such ethic found in the Koran. The basis of the Golden Rule is the universal equality of all humankind, regardless of their religion, race or origin. It does not say: Do unto some persons, as you would have them do unto you, but do unto all persons as you would have them do unto you.

I asked a question looking for answers about this disconnect, and got this response.

Where is the golden rule in the Koran?

"Nowhere in the Koran is there an expression of the Golden Rule, therefore, it is of no importance in Islam and Muslims have no reason to observe it. Since Islam's most important message to humanity (the Noble Koran) does not contain the Golden Rule, it is logical that it was unimportant to Allah. This explains why he entirely omitted it from the Koran. The Golden Rule is held to be central by all religions except Islam.

In Islam, Number 13 of Imam "Al-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths, it would be "None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself." The caveat with the Islamic version is the view of humanity- for Islamic reciprocity is restricted to interactions between Muslim "brothers". (An infidel is not to be addressed as "brother" by a Muslim.) This limitation is further explained in Bukhari 8,73,70 Mohammed said: "Harming a Muslim is an evil act; killing a Muslim means rejecting Allah."

(Note: but harming or killing an infidel is a mere misdemeanour.) Islam divides the entire world into Islam and the Kafirs (unbelievers) and has two separate sets of ethics for each sphere.

Finally, the Koran itself makes it clear that brotherhood applies only towards other Muslims: (Koran 48:29) : "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah; and those who are with him are harsh against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other."

The basis of the Golden Rule is the universal equality of all humankind, regardless of their religion, race or origin. It does not say: Do unto some persons, as you would have them do unto you, but do unto all persons as you would have them do unto you.

Islam denies the universality of the Golden Rule because Islam starts with the division of all humanity, into two different groups: Islamic and non-Islamic. Every aspect of Islamic ethics is based upon this separation, thus Islam has two different ethical codes. Said another way, Islam has dualistic ethics. Thus, in Islam, "Good" is whatever advances Islam; "Evil" is whatever resists Islam."

 

 

Grassfires.org

Link

My friend posted this and I am spreading the word...we need to be involved

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Remembering broken promises

In another blog I wrote about my life, from high school, college, and my first job out of school, teaching in the DoD school system in Germany (hey see the world right?) It was there i met my first husband, and we had a good time together, blah blah blah. It was 30 years ago this month that I caught him making arrangements to go on vacation with another woman, and left him. We tried to reconcile a few moneys later, but like a bad movie cliche, all we had good together was sex...our views on the rest of the universe were so different. Then shortly thereafter I got my American Express bill for a trip for two to Club Med in Cancun...where I have never been! I called and found my soon to be ex had used the Card to prepay while we were in "reconciliation" . I was told that even if I cancelled the card, i still owed the money since it was my account...ARRRRRRGGGGGH. I called the a>>hole and said as soon as things could be final, that was the last i ever wanted to hear from ...well you know. I remember burning pictures in a fireplace and thinking how happy I felt doing it...sick i know...

I tend to carry a grudge and was angry about this for say...oh...20 years!!!! Then a friend at work said something i knew already, just needed to hear..."That was then, you are in a wonderful marriage now, let it go..."  So I have moved on. Which is a good thing because...

This is one of my favorite songs, and it took really intense meaning for me in March 1979

Friday, March 27, 2009

When in the course of human events...

Sound familiar? It should

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich thinks the USA is close to becoming a de facto dictatorship. Here is what he says:

"We are seeing the biggest power grab by politicians in American history.

"... The idea that they would propose the Treasury can intervene and take over non-bank, non-financial system assets, gives them the potential to basically create a dictatorship. You don't do what they want, they take over your company.

"... It absolutely moves you toward a political dictatorship," he said.

Hmmmm…the blog where I found this says that Newt is full of bull excrement.. That we were a dictatorship under George W. I disagree; not that I thought GW was that great,(or even  a good president, I mean he did do so dumb ass things) but I didn't’t see wholesale abrogation of the Bill of Rights. I do think they pushed too far in justification of doing things without a legal process, like warrant less wiretaps, and monitoring people’s emails and communications, but I wrote about that in a blog at the time.

So to me and the three people that might actually read this blog, I say GW being a dictator, that’s baloney.

Now onto the “Sage of the Senate” Senator Byrd. He wrote a letter to BO (President Obama) complaining that senatorial powers were being stripped away.

In a letter written to Obama, Senator Byrd warned: "The rapid and easy accumulation of power by White House staff can threaten the Constitutional system of checks and balances.... At the worst, White House staffs have taken direction and control of programmatic areas that are the statutory responsibility of Senate-confirmed officials."

 It is said that on the final day of deliberation at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, a female passerby asked an exiting Ben Franklin, "Well Doctor, what have we got — a republic or a monarchy?" He replied, "A Republic, if you can keep it." But if Ben Franklin were alive today to witness the unlimited, king-like power of President Barack Obama, he would answer that we are definitely living under an elected monarch.

It must be stressed that the aggrandizement of power within the executive branch certainly did not start under the current occupant of the White House. President Barack Obama is simply the latest in a long line of presidents who is all too happy to wield expansive presidential power that would have horrified the Founding Fathers. Obama's "progressive" agenda and his actions after being in office for a little over a month illustrate that he plans to build upon that legacy of centralization and control by leaps and bounds.

When writing in the Declaration of Independence about the "long train of abuses and usurpations" committed on the colonists by the tyrannical king of Great Britain, Thomas Jefferson identified a series of such abuses, including "[the king] has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance." The description of this abuse has eerie similarities to the growing list of executive departments collectively referred to as "the administrative state." Defenders of liberty have much to worry about as unelected bureaucrats based out of D.C. exercise powers that were once solely reserved to Congress, the states, or the people themselves.

Daniel McCarthy, in an article entitled Our Enemy, The President, writes, "Right-wing presidentialism failed "Right-wing presidentialism failed spectacularly under Bush and has now yielded to what may be the strongest expression of left-wing presidentialism since Franklin Roosevelt. Conservatives have an important lesson to learn here. They must not only oppose Obama as they once opposed FDR, they must recognize the threat that presidential power represents to an ordered Republic no matter which party occupies the Oval Office."

That is, grass-roots activists who want to restore constitutional liberty to the "land of the free" should work to strip the president of powers he was never intended to have.

Change will require a national movement to remind both Congress and the president of their constitutional roles. President Obama might be the latest wielder of unconstitutional executive power, and he certainly plans to use it like no one before, but the problem is bigger than Obama. America needs to return to the role for the federal government designed by the attendees of the Constitutional Convention.

I saw the Tea Party here in Sacramento, and lately there are more and more calls to “Take Back Our Country”. From who, I mean we elected these rascals, fell for their goofy promises…Remember, “How can you tell if a politician is lying?  Answer: his/her lips are moving”.

 

Enough already???   http://taxdayteaparty.com/

 

Thursday, March 26, 2009

What about the jobs to build a strong economy?

Asked of President Obama

"When do we expect the jobs that have been outsourced to other countries to come back and be made available to the unemployed workers here in the United States?"

The president responded that much of the outsourcing was of low-wage, low-skill labor.

"It's very hard to hang onto those jobs," he said, "because there's always a country out there that pays lower wages than the U.S. And so we've got to go after the high-skilled, high-wage jobs of the future...We've got to do is create new jobs that can't be outsourced."

The president cautioned ... that "we're going to have to be patient and persistent about job creation because I don't think that we've lost all the jobs we're going to lose in this recession. We're still going to be in a difficult time for much of this year."

A woman from Michigan whose family members who work for GM and Ford prompted President Obama to provide a sneak preview of an announcement about automakers to likely take place on Monday.

"What specific steps do you see your administration taking about the health of the auto industry?" he was asked . The president called it a "very topical question because I'm going to be making some announcements over the next several days about the auto industry. I don't want to make all the news here today, so I'm not going to be as specific as you'd like, but I guarantee in the next few days you will have a very extensive answer on what we need to do."

Mr. Obama said as a "general philosophical approach" he believes "we need to preserve a U.S. auto industry...but the price is that you've got to finally restructure to deal with these long-standing problems. And that means that everybody is going to have to give a little bit -- shareholders, workers, creditors, suppliers, dealers -- everybody is going to have to recognize that the current model, economic model, of the U.S. auto industry is unsustainable."

The president said his administration expects "the automakers are going to be working with us to restructure" -- but with the onus on automakers. "Can they come up with a viable plan? If they're not willing to make the changes and the restructurings that are necessary, then I'm not willing to have taxpayer money chase after bad money," he said.

"And so a lot of it's going to depend on their willingness to make some pretty drastic changes," he added. "And some of those are still going to be painful because I think you're not going to see a situation where the U.S. automakers are gaining the kind of share that they had back in the 1950s. I mean, we just didn't have any competition back then, Japan was in rubble, Europe was in rubble -- we were the only players around. And that's not going to be true. This is going to be a competitive global market. We have to make those adjustments."

Oh,  I hope this doesn't mean the government is going to take over the car companies...

 

Nominee steps down

President Obama's nominee to be deputy Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, Jon Cannon, withdrew his name from consideration today.

The Obama administration is not commenting on this story beyond the above.

HMMMMMM...

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Thoughts while stuck in traffic-

Thoughts while stuck in traffic-  

I can’t take thinking about the knuckleheads in our government…. Of both parties!  

Watching BO talk on TV was unsettling, since the man doesn’t  seem to want to ever discuss anything without an electronic crutch (like a teleprompter, or like last night a BIG Screen in back of the room with his speech on it. So that leads me to thinking about …

Who makes the circuit boards the government uses? I mean if the Chinese are, doesn’t that compromise our security? (Remember, I’m in a car going 8 mph in traffic)

Military strategists are concerned that declining U.S. manufacturing capacity for a relatively old technology — printed-circuit boards — could slow the planned shift to network-centric warfare. A key military requirement is for rugged boards that must perform under extreme conditions. PC-boards are being used by DoD in increasingly sophisticated ways to connect active and passive components. These applications are expected to grow further as networked operations expand.

DoD noted that U.S. pc-board production in 2006 was just less than 10 percent of estimated global revenues compared to 42 percent in 1984.

OK, now explain who is making most of the circuit boards then?? For now the DoD is counting on their own plants and TTM Technologies in California (San Diego, Santa Clara) and Stafford CT.

This makes me wonder- are there any American TV’s anymore.

I know as a kid there were about 9 companies, then eventually it was down to RCA and a couple others, then…gone. Even our family favorite Curtis Mathes seems to be mostly a furniture company now, selling foreign made TVs and Blu-Ray players

Oddly enough, SyntaxBrillian (headquartered in Tempe AZ) make TVs in California…yeah, in Ontario. The supposedly only Asia component is the flat panel that is made by them in China…the circuits and other components are made here(including the plastic cabinet)

“The Ontario, California LCD and LCoS™ facility is the second major production and assembly facility opened by Syntax-Brillian this month. On Oct. 16, 2006 the company announced the opening of a 30,000+ sq. ft. LCD TV production facility in Nanjing, China, with a projected output of 300,000 units annually for the Asian market.”

Syntax Brilliance (BRLC) has recently reported their plant in Ontario, California is gearing up to double production, as this plant has in the past been limited to 200,000 units per year and will increase up to 500,000

This was the only one I could find, thought there are other “made” here…but consist of almost all overseas made components..

Why are child births becoming more and more to unwed women, and at what age??

Back in 2006, the percent of unwed mothers having children was around 30-35%. 3 years later, we're at 40%.

I guess I can believe in that change…oops

Is it any wonder why I have watched the movie Idiocracy several times…I think it’s a primer on America in the near future.

House Passes Mandatory Service-Learning

section 120(3)(b)
‘(B) service-learning is a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.

From what I got in reading the bill, section 6104, which establishes national service, was struck, however service-learning seems to be learing by doing something, and its mandatory.

Under section 6104 of the bill, entitled “Duties,” in subsection B6, the legislation states that a commission will be set up to investigate, “Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.”

“The legislation, slated to cost $6 billion over five years, would create 175,000 “new service opportunities” under AmeriCorps, bringing the number of participants in the national volunteer program to 250,000. It would also create additional “corps” to expand the reach of volunteerism into new sectors, including a Clean Energy Corps, Education Corps, Healthy Futures Corps and Veterans Service Corps, and it expands the National Civilian Community Corps to focus on additional areas like disaster relief and energy conservation,”

Okie dokie.......

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Dear Doubters- understand these things

In 2001, several people hijacked airplanes and rammed them into the World Trade Center, and the Pentagon. Other targets were the Library Tower in Los Angeles, Sears Tower in Chicago, and maybe some buildings in other cities. These other cities were not hit either because the plotters narrowed the scope of the attack, or the plotters got scared, or the plotters were on planes that got grounded before departure or shortly thereafter. We may never really know.

What I know is that my cousin was in Tower 2. That he escaped and helped others is verifible by not only his words, but news films. And his published account in the papers. After a year or so he decided he couldnt be a financial analyst anymore, and volunteered to go back into the Army. He said he couldnt sleep knowing people out there were trying to and almost did kill him, and want the same fate for us all. He is still in the Army.

With the news now focused on the economy and other topics, I  provide you a 8 minute video of what our enemy are still talking about. I am not a fear monger, but if you tell me you want to kill me, bet that I dont watch you carefully, and keep my weapons close at hand...

Our troops, may they prevail and return safely.

This video is a man talking to people about attacking the US from Mexico with anthrax

 

 

Hotel California Live - Eagles




Sunday, March 22, 2009

Missing Somali-Americans Back in U.S. After Overseas Terror Mission

I read this headline and spurted coffee onto the page, "What !!!!"

The background of the story is that for several months the FBI has been investigating at least 20 Somali-American men from the Minneapolis area who traveled to war-torn Somalia, where some of them trained and fought with an Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group known as al-Shabaab, according to counterterrorism officials.

Asked to characterize how many of those men are now back on American soil, the source would only say that "several" have returned. Federal authorities believe the men went to Somalia to join al-Shabaab, which has been warring with the moderate Somali government since 2006. "Some of the guys who were missing aren't missing anymore," the source said. "Some of them got blown up and some of them came back, and some of them are still there [in Somalia]."

I was amazed these people are wondering around on the streets- isn't it against the law to leave the US, engage in terrorism, and return? FBI Director Robert Mueller said the trend of young men "radicalized and recruited" in the United States to take up arms overseas "in particular concerns us." No shit sherlock...

At a Senate hearing in Washington last week, counterterrorism officials said there is no intelligence to indicate that Somali-Americans who traveled to Somalia are planning attacks inside the United States.

“We do not have a credible body of reporting right now to lead us to believe that these American recruits are being trained and instructed to come back to the United States for terrorist attacks,” said Philip Mudd, a top-ranking official with the FBI’s National Security Branch. “Yet, obviously, we remain concerned about that, and watchful for it.”

Have we REALLY become so inured in political correctness that we allow citizens of our country to go overseas, learn tricks of the trade in terrorism and come home to what, work at Burger King??? Why would they do it...oh, and the group that is training them is the Somalian terror organization Shabaab al Mujahideen. Their goal is (here's a shocker) as articulated in an April statement, is to throw the West "into hell.”

Shabaab al Mujahideen, which espouses radical Islamic rule and has close ties to Al Qaeda, is best known for operating training camps for people seeking a more extreme form of Jihad. It also has been forging relations with Somali pirates who have recently been intercepting and holding for ransom several international shipping vessels.

Click here to see video of one of Shabaab's training camps in Somalia.

Since I am on the subject of terrorism (what war on terror, according to Obama there is no war on terror) check out the videos posted by The NEFA Foundation including  a recently released video recording of a November 20, 2008 suicide truck bombing attack on a joint-U.S.-Afghan military base in the southeastern Afghan province of Khost. The video shows footage of the bomber - identified as "Qari Abu Omar”, a “patient man with experience in jihad” - as he assists in the preparation of nearly 3,000kg of explosives, his farewell to the camera, and the subsequent blast itself.  [which is shown repeatedly]

Warning- you might not want to watch these..

http://www1.nefafoundation.org/multimedia-prop.html

 

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Yahoo 360 is goofy

I wish I could count on Yahoo 360 like I have for the last 3 years, but alas, pleas to them to fix and migrate 360 to something stable and reliable are not working. I come home and like to blog a little in the early evening, and instead of finding some relaxation, i get frustrated because 360 fails to post the blog, or parts of it (like html inserts) dont post, or peoples commemnts dont post. Better yet somedays the page doesnt load...so i am pretty much resigned to moving elswhere. All my blogs will be available there.

I love you Yahoo, but 360 sucks. Thats too bad.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Second AMERICAN Revolution

 I saw this today, and think he is onto something...I don't care where you are politically, many (me among them) think the government we vote for to represent us is not doing such a hot job of late....

 

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Teleprompter malfunction

President Barack Obama doesn’t go anywhere without his TelePrompter.

The textbook-sized panes of glass holding the president’s prepared remarks follow him wherever he speaks.

Resting on top of a tall, narrow pole, they flank his podium during speeches in the White House’s stately parlors. They stood next to him on the floor of a manufacturing plant in Indiana as he pitched his economic stimulus plan. They traveled to the Department of Transportation this week and were in the Capitol Rotunda last month when he paid tribute to Abraham Lincoln in six-minute prepared remarks.

Obama’s reliance on the teleprompter is unusual – not only because he is famous for his oratory, but because no other president has used one so consistently and at so many events large and small.

After the teleprompter malfunctioned a few times last summer and Obama delivered some less-than-soaring speeches, reports surfaced that he was training to wean himself off of the device while on vacation in Hawaii. But no luck.

This may be news to the throngs of Obamabots who elected him, but not to those of us who paid attention to Obama on the campaign trail.  When he had the TelePrompters, he made crowds swoon.  When he didn’t, though, things would go terribly wrong.  Most of the fumbles on the campaign trail —came when Obama had to go off script.  Once, his TelePrompter failed for a couple of moments and he stammered until someone apparently fixed it.

 

By comparison, President Bill Clinton was adept at continuing his prepared remarks, even when the TelePrompter failed.

 

Paul Begala recalls what happened when Clinton made a speech to a joint session of Congress. Despite a lot of planning and preparation, there was a snafu.

So the president gets up there, and he looks out at the screen and he sees it says, "William Jefferson Clinton"--we'd always put a heading on it--"William Jefferson Clinton, Address to Joint Session of Congress, A New Beginning for the American Economy." And he turns to Gore and he says, "Al, they've got the wrong speech up there." Gore says, "No, no, that's not possible." So Gore kind of looks down so he can see, and--so Gore calls George over and tells him, and they go through holy hell to try to find the speech.

Afterwards I asked Clinton, "What was going through your mind? I've got to know." First I went and apologized. I had played a role in that. I was terribly sorry. I wanted to make sure he knew that I felt responsible for it. He was utterly forgiving, not at all angry, and I said, "What did it feel like? What was going through your mind?" And he said, "Well, I stood up there, I saw it was the wrong speech, and I thought, "Well, Lord, I guess you're testing me. Okay, here goes." And with brimming self-confidence--now we had given him a backup text, but it was too small for him to read without his glasses. We had taken his glasses out of his pocket so there wouldn't be an unsightly bulge for the TV cameras.

So the poor guy is up there alone and naked on the most complex public policy issue, a fairly complex bill, and he went the first nine minutes without a note, and nobody could tell. It was phenomenal. Worse than that, the teleprompter screens are whizzing forward and backwards with last year's speech, trying to find it, and finally, they killed it all together and reloaded it. Nine minutes the guy went without a note, and no one could tell.

 

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Entry for March 15, 2009

Our nation was founded on the premise that government should be of the people, but that direct democracy was untenable, so a democraticly elected representation government, a republic, should be the form of this new government. In setting this government up, the first job was to overthrow the rule of the king, and then work on refining the government, which came into being with the constitutional convention. One of the framers of these ideas, was someone who seems very relevant today, Thomas Jefferson.

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have." - Thomas Jefferson

Think about what that means in the context of today. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than 1.8 million civilians work for the Federal Government, excluding the Post Office. The military is another large group on th federal payroll, with active forces at 1,444,553 and slightly more in the reserve.

This nation built up this military force after scaling back at the end of WWII, notably to demonstrate our ability to meet any threat our ideological foes, notably the Soviet Union, could pose. Yet the enormous military is of little benefit in our current situation.

I have written on this for years, 3 years here in this blog, that the hell bent desire for American business to compete globally has led to a wholesale sell off of our heritage, the very freedom we cherish. We have done so at the expense of maintaining status as industrial giant that gained its economic leverage from American workers producing everything American consumers wanted, from diapers and electronics, cameras and cars, gave the world numerous inventions and medical advances, captured the imagination of a planet with manned voyages to the moon and probes to the outer reaches of our solar system.

Then this afternoon I came across one of the many documentaries about how evil Wal Mart is. I used to get really steamed up at Wal Mart, but about now i am seeing they aren't the problem, they are just biggest representative of the symptoms of the deeper illness in our lifes. Crap we even made a movie about it, Wall Street...pure greed.

I guess we are all part of the problem, since we continue to shop for things like clothes, appliances, cars etc, and allow the big corporations to further erode any balance in the need to maximize profits. Maximize profits, reduce overheard, cut operating costs are all in todays business world synonymous with outsourcing. A movie i recently saw the characters said they were being insourced, and when questioned, said well the company hires the illegals, and pays them sub wages, so all the other folks they replaced weren't outsourced, they were in sourced...

People in the media that point this all out are stifled or ridiculed, so what chance does a middle aged woman have to stir up anything from a blog read by a handful of people? NIL??...

I wrote to my US Senators, saying how about some real stimulus in the economy, tell these MFers that from now on every piece of junk they sell needs to be either American made or have 40% American components, and not just minimum wages either, but a wage a person can live on. That was two weekd ago, and all i got was a generated email that "The Senator is working hard to help California, and will be unable to respond to your email" I wrote back and said dont count on my vote in the future.

My daughter is currently supporting her and her husband; he is oout of work, and has no benefits, and because he works as a independent carpenter, I dont think he gets unemployment, since I doubt he ever paid into the fund like you are supposed to. Her job in unionized, and she has full benefits, and makes enough to paid their expenses, supplemented with savings from when he did work. He cant find much remodelling work, because when there is some minor work to be done he is out bid by others using what he calls Home Depot labor...latinos here without legal documents, willing to work for next to nothing.

I work myself into a very depressed state, no not depressed, frustated and with a feeling of futility thinking about this crap...sorry, i dont swear in these forums much, but it seems appropriate.

So to summarize:

American business greed has simultaneously put us at the mercy of the Chinese economically and managed to wreck the US economy, and severely cramp the global economy..

Our Presidents (Bush and Obama) are utter tools, or fools, and have dinkered around and not done too much so far...

The peoples representative are completely and totally nutz, and have committed the USA to a get a better way of life thru debt to the tune of probably $21 trillion dollars by my estimate using a algorythm I made that takes past debt trends and forecasts to the future...

Oh, and I think i need to say that several weeks ago i predicted the Chinese would start musing about having over a barrel, and then what pops in the news, but Obama promising the Chinese they are safe in loaning us some dough:

"Obama, responding swiftly to Chinese worries about their trillion-dollar investment in U.S. government debt, said the U.S. economy remains the most vibrant in the world and continues to attract foreign money even amid its deep recession.

His comments came less than a day after Chinese Premier Wen Jibao said he was "definitely a little worried" about Chinese holdings of U.S. bonds.

The exchange was an unusual public commentary on the soundness of the U.S. economy."

And then there is the other agenda of the new administration, which if it comes to pass will likely spark a second coming alright, but not biblical- a second Constitutional Congress to cede the 20 states sovereignty, ones that have openly told the feds they are nutz, and want to have a do over with the union. Welcome to the Western States Alliance of America?

"Lawmakers in 20 states move to reclaim sovereignty
Obama's $1 trillion deficit-spending 'stimulus plan' seen as last straw
Following passage of stimulus plan and budget package, analysts expect that in addition, another 20 states may see similar measures introduced this year, including Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania. "

One source of frusrtation and some fear from the states is the new administrations determination to push the United States to be part of the global community via A Plan for Action,1 which features a revealingly immodest subtitle: A New Era of International Cooperation for a Changed World: 2009, 2010, and Beyond.

(Footnotes 1 The report can be downloaded free of charge at http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/11_action_plan_mgi.aspx.)

The Plan calls for the United States committmitment to “a rule-based international system that rejects unilateralism and looks beyond military might,” or else “resign [our]selves to an ad-hoc international system.” Mere “traditional sovereignty” is insufficient in the new era we have entered, an era in which we must contend with “the realities of a now transnational world.” This “rule-based international system” will create the conditions for “global governance.” I saw this and my heart started pounding- Global Governence?? Forget whatever fear you ahave about the North American Union, this is way beyond that...the article continued

"This is what “responsible sovereignty” would look like. For the signatories of A Plan of Action, sovereignty is simply an abstraction, a historical concept about as important today as the “sovereigns” from whose absolute rights the term originally derived. That is not the understanding of the U.S. Constitution, which locates the basis of its legitimacy in “we the people,” who constitute the sovereign authority of the nation.

“Sharing” sovereignty with someone or something else is thus not abstract for Americans. Doing so by definition will diminish the sovereign power of the American people over their government and their own lives, the very purpose for which the Constitution was written. This is something Americans have been reluctant to do. Now their reluctance may have to take the form of more concerted action against “responsible sovereignty” if its on"ward march is to be halted or reversed. Our Founders would clearly understand the need.

Bold letters were added by me...sovereignty is abstract...? Honey says he will defend the constitution like his military oath said " ... that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;.."

Problem is who are the enemies???

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Odds and Ends - March 14, 2009

I have written a couple of blogs lately that Yahoo just would not load, so here goes...

Factoid 1 - Meyers Briggs Personality Type - ENTJ -

Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Judging

Factoid 2 - IQ - people I work with think i am smart, which is not something i encourage. In college i one day started to wonder why I could take in one semester 18 units and get a B- average and drop the next semester to 9 units(3 classes) and get a C average...and concluded its was too much alcohol, drugs and maybe loss of brain cells. I went to the student counselling center and had a series of tests by a phychologist. She told me I average out at about 128 adjusted for age, and to lay off the drugs. That put me in the high range of above average intelligence. I am not so sure that's true anymore, I have not read anything that says with time we get dumber, but that experiencial learning augments out mental skills.

Factoid 3 - Brain age = 35 years old. (yay me)

Factoid 4 - Real age (a evaluation of current physical condition)

As someone who quit cigarettes 12 years ago, the negatives from that are pretty well abated, but other issues drag down my score. I did the Real Age test and my 55 years old bumps up to the body of a 56.9 year old...but I justed update and it now says.. 48!!! (Hey knocking 8 years off is a BIG deal to me.)

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Military Service

One of my Yahoo friends has written extensively (for him) about 30 years ago joining the Air Force. I read his blog to honey, who has the distinction to having been a sergeant in the Marines and later an officer in the Army. He smiled as I read the blog and said maybe I should write something about him going into the service. He was in college (junior college) and went to the gym one day where the draft (that’s right, involuntary service) was being held over a loud speaker live from Washington. He says they were near the end of the number and then they announced the birth date of a friend and the number “two”, and honey smiled and said to his friend, “shitty luck for you”, and a few minutes later his birth date came up, “ten”. He thought that was OK, but then they said they would be drafting the first 10 “immediately”, and his friend started laughing.

Honey says they went to the apartment and consumed a lot of beer, knowing life in the future was going to suck. It was there a guy at the bar says he knew how to avoid the draft, and they started talking. Turns out he was a recruiter, and told them if they enlisted, they could get a occupation of choice, not get screwed. Honey went for it. He did a delay to finish that semester and was soon scheduled for his physical at the Oakland California Armed Forces Entrance Examination Station.

He did fine and came home, proud he had enlisted in the Marines, like his dad had done during Korea. Later he got a phone call from Oakland, a Navy commander was asking him if he would like to consider switching to the navy; he has scored exceptionally well on the aptitude tests. What’s the deal he asked? We want you to switch to the Navy and become a nuclear power specialist…oh, but you will have to enlist for 6 years, not 2.  Honey says he thought about it, but thought 6 years, crap he’d be in his mid20’s when he got out; forget that!

Honey says flying to the east coast was puzzling to him, since there is a recruit depot in southern California. He remembers getting off the plane and wandering around with this big envelope of paper they mailed him, which he was supposed to bring with him. He soon recognized other lost looking young men with envelopes like him. Eventually a Marine came walking through the airport, the most shiny black shoes, blue trousers with the red stripe, and khaki shirt. Honey says the guy looked to be maybe a year or two older then him, and had a crap load of ribbons on his shirt (Honey says its called a blouse in the Marines). He calmly rounded them all up, and they walked to a military bus , to take them “to your new home, people.” All was well until he says they arrived at the main gate, and a terrified looking young man in marine fatigues jumped onto the bus and yelled “ DRILL SERGEANT, THESE PEOPLE  ARE TO BE PROCESSED AT  ..” honey does remember , but it was their destination…and upon arrival, he said there were several large red brick buildings and across the street several buildings he knew from his dad were called  Quonset huts . It was then that the hell began, and several Marines dressed as the one at the airport, and their escort from the airport began yelling to get their slimy “rear end” off the bus. Honey actually says the string of profanity was dazzling, far surpassing anything he had ever heard. He remembers some of the guys from recruit training, but says he will never forget Staff Sergeant Vinzena. He was the most profane, meanest, out and out sadistic man honey has ever met. He was both admired and hated by the men. Honey says once they were doing exercises and this guy came alone and starting yelling and screaming and they all took off on a run in the rain, on a disgustingly hot humid day. Soon a jeep came along with a officer, looking for sergeant Vinzena and locating him called the men to a halt and proceeded to chew out the sergeant for running the men on a red flag day. Sergeant said he was merely showing the men what a Royal Marine Commando has to do, and introduced the other man. The officer, unimpressed, said to walk the men back to the area and report to him.

He says that if you want to truly experience the closest recreation to his own experience, by far the best movie is Boys In Company C…. he plays the recruit depot part at least once a year, notably on the day he got out of the Marines, July 20 1973.

The rest of his tour of duty is something he does not talk about, and I mean ever. There is a picture in our home of him and several other men in a clearing, cleaning weapons and eating out of cans. Honey says they were his squad in the war. The only other picture he has (at least on the wall) is a black and white picture of him and another guy behind a wall next to a car riddled with bullet holes. He was given the picture by a photographer for Stars and Stripes. I have no idea where it was, all honey says is it was shitty. If you have ever seen the movie “Full Metal Jacket” during the part where they go into a small city honey leaves the room, says he “don’t want those nightmares”.  

OK time to end this blog, I am starting to wander and my eyes are… well, watery. I love my honey, and all those that put their very existence on the line for us as a people. 

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Entry for March 11, 2009

Looks vex me.

Listen, my heritage is essential Swedish, German, Scottish, Irish, and the rest of northern Europe in various smaller percentiles. That means my “bone structure” runs on the big side…as in 6 feet tall, and due to thyroid, diabetes, high blood pressure etc (whatever ) what the doctor calls overfat. (seriously, not overweight, overfat)

As age progresses, I find there are fewer (and fewer) looks my way. Not like people look away in horror, it’s like I am part of the landscape. Part of that blur in the background while you look around…lawn, trees, buildings, sidewalk, big blonde woman…am I a blonde anymore? It says so on my license, but it looks light brown, with some blonde maybe…vanity, some of the blonde has gone grey

The exception would be guys more or less older than me what like to smile, sometimes say “how’s it going” or good morning. Then there are the “internet people”…people like those on 360, MySpace, Multiply, Eons, etc, that read your blog (maybe) and then strike up an exchange of messages, if you let them. Any more I do if they are polite, with the caveat that message asking for risqué photos or more ends the conversation.

Some of these online suitors have actually suggested things that really kinda bugged me..

Some are into fetish behavior, and try as they will, I am not getting it, why. Nothing weird like smelling ladies shoes in the dark on a Tuesday, there is a desire to participate in physical contact of the abusive kind. Not my thing, at ALL. As much as my dad smacked me growing up, I never associated it with love or sexuality. Lest I make them uncomfortable, I change gears here.

Back to my original premise; via some observing of others my age, I no longer feel like I alone, for I am part of the fairer gender that is now relegated to status of backdrop to life. There are tons of us, women over say 50 that have lost the allure of youth, no manner how hard we try to keep it.

I have taken over our bath room with various cosmetics, facial oils, body creams, moisturizers, eye moisturizer, and skin toners, not to mention the small suitcase of eye, face and lip makeup I have. I need the help. But I will still be a ‘mature woman’. At least I know that. Now where are those spike heels and miniskirt with the see thru blouse?

Just kidding, believe me, just kidding…spike heels???are you crazy..at MY age?

Monday, March 9, 2009

Jeffersonian Democracy - March 09, 2009

We all should know that the principal author of the Declaration of Independence was destine to become our nations third President- Thomas Jefferson

Lately, has anger arises from federal activities (i.e. huge budget, higher taxes, new mandated unfunded programs for states) some of Jefferson’s thoughts have become more poignant.

Jefferson maintained that,

· "[a] democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine."

· The national government is a dangerous necessity to be instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; it should be watched closely and circumscribed in its powers.

· The separation between church and state is the best method to keep religion free from intervention by the federal government, government free of religious disputes, and religion free from corruption by government.

· The federal government must not violate the rights of the individual.

· The federal government must not violate the rights of the states.

A key provision of the Kentucky Resolutions was Resolution 2, which denied that Congress had more than a few penal powers:

That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, and no other crimes, whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled “An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States,” as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled “An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States,” (and all their other acts which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution,) are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory.

Later, Jefferson drafted the language for other resolutions when New England states refused to follow the Embargo Act of 1807 based on the authority of states to stand up to laws deemed by those states to be unconstitutional (though they did not in fact try to nullify the laws). Another embargo passed in 1813 that hurt New England trade was questioned once again by Connecticut and Massachusetts; the supreme courts of both states issued their objections, including this statement from the Massachusetts General Court:

A power to regulate commerce is abused, when employed to destroy it; and a manifest and voluntary abuse of power sanctions the right of resistance, as much as a direct and palpable usurpation. The sovereignty reserved to the states, was reserved to protect the citizens from acts of violence by the United States, as well as for purposes of domestic regulation. We spurn the idea that the free, sovereign and independent State of Massachusetts is reduced to a mere municipal corporation, without power to protect its people, and to defend them from oppression, from whatever quarter it comes. Whenever the national compact is violated, and the citizens of this State are oppressed by cruel and unauthorized laws, this Legislature is bound to interpose its power, and wrest from the oppressor its victim.”

Later, most notably Andrew Jackson (you know, the guy on the $20 bill), the idea that states could actually invoke their rights was rejected “I consider...the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle on which it was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was formed." He also denied the right of secession: "The Constitution...forms a government not a league...To say that any State may at pleasure secede from the Union is to say that the United States is not a nation."

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Coverup - The Roland Carnaby Story

Roland Vincent Carnaby, a 52-year-old Lebanese man who lived in Pearland TX with his wife of 11 years, was initially pulled over during a routine traffic stop April 29, 2008, but drove off when the officer discovered his concealed weapon license. A high-speed chase ensued, during which Carnaby was said to be armed. He was fatally shot after officers said they thought he reached for a gun. He died in his blood stained suit, handcuffed ; officers rendered no first aid at the scene.

Relatives said Carnaby, was a secret federal agent for the FBI and CIA despite local and federal authorities not being able to verify that claim.

"There was no record of him being an employee of the FBI or CIA," Houston Police Department Chief Harold Hurtt said Wednesday.

Investigators initially only found a cell phone but then said they discovered two pistols and a shotgun inside Carnaby's sport utility vehicle. They said one was in the suspect's reach when the officers shot him.

Alan Helfman

"At any one time, he's got three or four shotguns, two guns on him, a knife," said Alan Helfmen, owner of the River Oaks Chrysler dealership and one of Carnaby's good friends. "I'd like to believe that he would not have tried to shoot somebody. That's not his mentality."

Helfman said Carnaby told people he was a CIA agent or some kind of national intelligence officer. He said Carnaby donated large amounts of money to HPD fundraisers, was highly intelligent, spoke seven languages and was the president of the Houston branch for the Association For Intelligence Officers.
Helfman said he met Carnaby a dozen years ago when the man showed up at his dealership to buy a vehicle with a mutual friend, high in local law enforcement. The two quickly became good friends.
Federal credentials were also found inside the black Jeep Commander SUV but investigators are still trying to determine if the identification is real.
"We don't know. They could've been made up," HPD Homicide Capt. Steve Jett said.
Relatives said they have plenty of proof that Carnaby was CIA, including an autographed book from, they say, his very close friend, former CIA Director George Tenet. However, plaques, paperwork and the people who love him say one thing: the truth seems to be just as much of a mystery as Carnaby himself.

Carnaby's lawyer, Kenneth Brooten, said the fatal shooting, which occurred after Carnaby exited his car at the end of the chase, did not appear necessary.

"All of this has a smell factor," Brooten said. "What was the justification for the use of deadly force? Was this man a felon that was fleeing the scene of an armed robbery? Had he pulled a gun on them previously? That's a public policy issue. That affects every person who drives around Houston or lives there."

"I recall people coming out recognizing him, `Hey Tony, how are you?' This is what I saw.

The executive director of the AFIO, Elizabeth Bancroft, said she met Carnaby several years ago at the group's functions held near McLean, Va. Carnaby was a very eager, enthusiastic AFIO member, Bancroft said. When she told him that the group's Houston chapter had been inactive for years, he volunteered to get it going again. She said he was an excellent organizer and boosted chapter membership to about 200 members. He also had extensive contacts with law enforcement, which helped him book speakers for the chapter's meetings. Carnaby asked the national headquarters if he could name the Houston chapter after CIA agent William Francis Buckley, who was kidnapped, tortured and killed in Lebanon in 1985.

"He talked about Buckley, how much he admired him and the bravery it must have taken to endure that type of torture that ends your life," she said.

For a person who was so supportive of law enforcement, Carnaby's final agony angers lawyer Brooten, who criticized the officers present for handcuffing him instead of administering medical care.

"All of this other stuff (about Carnaby's mysterious life) is all very interesting, but it is of no consequence when you consider a man is dead and he died handcuffed and nobody tried to stop the bleeding or anything," Brooten said. "You know what you call that? You call that an assassination."

Jett defended the officers at the scene, saying they are not trained to assist people with serious gunshot wounds.

"We would handcuff people and try to get them comfortable, but we're not paramedics, and most officers don't know about giving first aid like that other than CPR, and you don't want to give CPR to a gunshot victim," he said.

Investigators later found three weapons in Carnaby's car, police said. One pistol was under the passenger-side floormat. A second was between the seats. On the back seat floorboard lay a pistol-grip shotgun with a round in the chamber and the safety off.

Brooten said he has no idea why his friend and client ran from police, but he has a difficult time believing HPD's account.

"Maybe he thought he was being set up. That's speculation only," he said. "The answer is no, I don't know. But there are multiple reasons why an experienced professional would feel threatened. And given the actions after the shooting, maybe his instinct was correct."