Popular Posts

Saturday, July 31, 2010

US Army Officer Oath of Office

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and United States Code, officer of the US military swear allegience to the Constitution, and specifically this oath differs from the enlisted oath, there is no reference to "... I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, ..."

According to the US Army  history "the officer oath has undergone substantial minor modification since 1789".

My honey was appointed a officer in the Army after serving 2 years in the Marines as enlisted(yes at one time there was a 2 year active duty enlistment) , using the G.I. Bill to finish college, and participation in a Army ROTC scholarship program.

The oath he took has no end date.  The oath I took as a police communications specialist years ago was similar, says

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter."

So if we both at some point took a oath to do these things, and have never reneged on it, how is it that members of Congress and local legislatures can violate these same oaths on a regular basis and be re-elected????

Friday, July 30, 2010

Are we citizens, or shall we be subjects?

Here now, is my weekly rant:

What good is an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the united States of America if those who are elected an take that oath renege on it as soon as they step into their plush taxpayer paid office and relax in their taxpayer paid for furnishings and begin conspiring to usurp the very core of the oath, in the name of governance? That those in power today see  themselves as above the law, and indeed as better than the people that elected them, is no longer a question.The question is how much longer before the people revoke their privileges to act as sovereigns and elect fellow citizens to act on their behalf on a temporary basis! Service in Congress and the Senate, or any other office, was once considered a honor, to serve at the leisure of the people, who hold all power, and from whom the government draws its authority.


" Most bad government comes from too much government"— Thomas Jefferson


We are there people, and we either return control of this government to ourselves as citizens, or we shall become its subjects.

A citizen has rights, a subject has priviliges.

If we are subjects, the government can tell us what to do, what the limits are of our activities, and how to conduct ourselves, at the whim of those who rule.

It is as citizens, participating in a free state, where we are subject to none but ourselves, but where we are citizens bound by justifiable laws, that we are most free as a people.

We are not subject to anything, or anyone but ourselves, as free sovreign citizens.

As free citizens, we have no obligation to comply with laws, or regulations that are unconstitutional.
Sure, there are situations where folks disagree(or pretend to disagree) about what the constitution says, or how it says it, or what it means. Here's the thing: Nuance and subtelty are not in the language of the constitution.

Justice

Chief Justice John Roberts at his own confirmation hearings in 2005:

“Judges are like umpires,” Roberts said. “Umpires don't make the rules; they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules. But it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire.”

Enough said...

Thursday, July 29, 2010

What is this...Mob rule?

Why do some people have such envy for those who earn more than they do?

 A little background…

 

 

I think I peaked out salary wise two years ago, because since then I have taken pay cuts, cuts in hours, and this week they said we needed to scale back more, and so now they are on this “flatten the organization” kick. Several people I used to work with are gone, and we lost two more today. My pal Laurie is gone tomorrow, although she found another job when they told her about the “new corporate plan”…writing on the wall, when you see the new company organization chart and you aren’t on it, take a clue and start looking FAST…My part of the organization is still looking at ways to save money.

 

I told honey we may need to think about early retirement and living in a shack somewhere, since I doubt we could keep living here the way it’s going, with 12% unemployment…I will have to wait and see. Today they announced someone was now going to lead a new unit (formed with what’s left of three old units) and she will get a title, but no more $$$.

 

Current Situation

So when I write things about taxes and so forth, I don’t do it lamenting my own situation, but the situation our country is in.

 

If I had a lot of money, why would I want to give it to the government, instead of making it useful to, DUH, make more money.

 

An example of what I am referring to (sort of)

I have an uncle who used to sell real estate, just a sales guy selling houses. Then back in 1968, he figured he knew enough to manage some apartments, so he did. Be bough a 4 unit complex, lived in one and managed the other three. He fixed it up, and kept them occupied. As the property value went up, he used the apartments for collateral, and bought some more apartments. Soon he had 12, and decided he needed to have someone else manage the other units, since he wasn’t able to do all the maintenance and all the duties of management by himself, so he hired a manger for each, gave them free rent and a small salary. Then he kept doing this process for probably 15 years, eventually he needed fulltime maintenance people, so he hired some. And ground keeping crew, to keep the gardens looking nice. By 1980’s, he had a sizable operation. He formed a corporation. He managed the corporation, eventually he employed I think 55 people. When it doubled, he hired more. His brother, also in this business, said buy me out, so he did, and took on even more houses and apartments. He employed over 100 people. Technically it was his corporation, it was his money. He was CEO and President, his wife the treasurer and secretary. No stockholders, just him, and his wife. They took a risk buying every property, knowing things could not work out, they could lose it all.

 

When he retired in 1998, he sold his corporation, and is wealthy now. Lives in a nice retirement home in a pretty ritzy area east of San Francisco. Takes trips with his wife every summer to someplace new. Enjoys life. Why not, it’s HIS money.

 

Uncle Sam didn’t earn it, didn’t build the company with him. But now Uncle Obama says he shouldn’t have all that money, he should share it. Why?

He says he doesn’t mind paying taxes, but feels the government( current and past, and probably future) needs to think about who is building companies, who is earning money and not be telling him what to do. I agree with him.

I guess that means I am a bad person in some peoples view. Nobody said to him earn a lot of money and then give it to the government. Nobody should ever say that.

 

So when I hear people carping about Tax the rich, tax the rich, I think about how many jobs won’t exist because the capital to hire them is being eaten up by taxes. How many small businesses will simply close rather than work for nothing?

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

US Population Swells- Obama grants citizenship to anyone that wants it

No, not yet...but soon

The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants.. 

The issue was raised publicly by eight Republican senators who wrote to the White House on Monday to complain that they had heard the administration was readying a "Plan B" in case a comprehensive immigration reform bill cannot win enough support to clear Congress. 

The White House would not confirm or deny the claim. "The administration at the very minimum is studying legal ways to legalize people without having to go through any congressional debate about it," sources said, calling the senators' claim credible. "Whether somebody pulls the trigger on that, that's another issue." 

The senators -- Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; David Vitter, R-La.; Jim Bunning, R-Ky.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; James Inhofe, R-Okla.; and Thad Cochran, R-Miss. -- claimed in their letter that the administration was looking at extending what is known as deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States. 

A former official said …either deferred action or parole to legalize at once the millions of immigrants who have overstayed their visas -- not necessarily those who crossed the border illegally Deferred action and parole would give illegal immigrants the ability to seek a work permit and temporary legal status, with fast track to citizenship. 

. The Department of Homeland Security estimated last year that 10.8 million undocumented residents live in the United States -- the Pew Hispanic Center, which has a similar count, estimated in 2006 that at least 4 million of them overstayed their visas. 

Those two tools are usually used on a case-by-case basis. The former official said any move to broaden that authority and use it on a mass basis would be "woefully inappropriate," though politically brilliant

The Republican senators who wrote to President Obama expressed a similar view. They wrote that any unilateral action would "further erode the American public's confidence in the federal government and its commitment to securing the borders and enforcing the laws already on the books." 

Lets all beat each other up...and blame each other for everything

I think thats where we as a society are...clamoring for freebies, and cheap stuff, and keep the benefits coming, but don't make me pay for it, and OH I know, lets make rich people pay for it.

Problem of that is rich people already pay the bulk of the tax burden, and if you keep taxing more and more, then they either move or stop being rich... No people, we need to straighten out the economy by leaving the world of me ism for what our parents and grandparents tried to teach us, a little self reliance and responsibility. We need to tell the government to stop spending so much, and instead focus on the core issues that are theirs to deal with and let each community deal with their citizens and tax as appropriate...IMHO

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Whats important?

My dad once told me "People are the most important thing in your life"

I believe that, and have tried to live that. I don't always succeed.

Last Monday, my mom told me my brothers youngest, a lanky 20 year old who has been fighting cancer, wasn't doing well. They had been camping and Monday he complained of stiffness in his back, and pain; his parents took him to the local hospital, which did some imaging, and said they needed to talk to his oncologist at the university hospital; the university doctor said he should be down there right away, so they took him by ambulance to the university hospital. There, the university doctors did some MRI's, and told my brother the cancer was growing at a rate that meant they could no longer do anything to stop it. It had slowed some after MONTHS of chemo and radiation treatments, which left the poor kid really beat up mentally and physically. He appeared to have been on the rebound, then this.

They brought him home Tuesday, he was on oxygen by Wednesday, and Thursday he passed away at home .

 I had been there to support my brother and sister in law, and had stepped out to get a breather and some lunch when my niece called and said he was gone.

I have been dealing with distant relatives and such since Thursday, and today was OK, until mom called to say my brother is now having nightmares about seeing his son deceased...I have that image as well, and when i do, all I can do is cry and cry some more..

My honey and I experienced the agony of watching someone die at home when my mother in law who was staying with us got cancer and slowly went from vibrant and spunky to bedridden and drugged up to deal with the pain.

So if I am absent from here and the groups I belong too, my family is very important to me, and right now I need them as much as they need me. I will be back to writing my usually sarcastic drivel soon enough. Thanks.

 

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Obama Money

For Release August 26, 2010

JuLS-1281

TREASURY ANNOUNCES RELEASE DATE FOR NEW NOTES


 

Beginning in 2011, the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve will implement an aggressive public education campaign to encourage the public to accept the newly issued U.S. currency.

Noting that changes in global economic conditions have altered the exchange rate between the United States and other nations, the new currency is tied to the current inflation index in an effort to stem inflation, and allow normal commerce to continue in the face of America’s mounting national debt.

The new currency will be issued through banks nationwide, with the exchange rate between pre 2011 dollars and New Federal reserve notes established by the Federal Reserve and Treasury

Information is available to the public in various formats, including posters and brochures and videos, plus an interactive CD-ROM and web site featuring "Special Agent Banks," who leads users through the lessons. For younger audiences, an educational web site will be launched momentarily in conjunction with the issuance of the notes.

Note: The preceding is fictional satire, and should not be taken seriously....Canice

Monday, July 19, 2010

America, forget China, lets build stuff!

Despair is a ugly word. The dictionary says it means: to lose all hope or confidence.

It rolls off the tongue easily, and yet I don’t hear people openly admitting to it…they talk about political overload, talking head talking points, whatever.

But the end result on my psyche is despair. Because I have lost all confidence in our government….city, county, state and national, they all are failing to redistribute the wealth that they plan to steal from each of us.

The news is constantly negative…high unemployment, government seems to hate  business, or at least they don’t get it, about how a free economy works. I talk to my coworkers about this stuff, and many of they want to talk about issues they feel important…about being green, about fixing immigration, about health care costs, about screw the other people let em get laid off and keep me. Things I understand, yet most often disagree with.

And there is the rub as they say…because we all have our pet peeves and favorite desires, we need to listen to each other,  and then as a group prioritize the list of stuff to do. We need to do this as individuals, and communities and a nation.

I don’t mean to prioritize the obvious, the emergencies…the oil spill, the potential disasters like tornado and flood, we know people impacted there need help, let’s give it to them.

I’m talking about what people are talking about, what impact them. No job, or if you have a job, you make less than before, due to wage cuts, higher taxes, higher health care costs.

I mean as a country we need to make things, substantial things, and not just buy everything from China…I remember not that long ago that almost everyone had a American car, appliances made here, clothes and shoes made here, furniture made here, in the USA by Americans for an American company.

If you have an iPod, iPhone or other innovative consumer items from Apple, did you know they are assembled in China under drearily dreadful conditions?

 

So our desire of inexpensive goods is more important than having low unemployment, and hence lower taxes? I mean if there are 12% less people working, then doesn’t that mean there is a greater need for government to take  my money in higher taxes!

But does it make sense to do this in a severe economic crisis?  How alone am I in saying this? I mean I should accept we are in a global economy, right? Not so fast.

America's strength was not in what it could make but in what it could invent, and the structure of our economy was changing from real factories to idea factories. After having struggled with this vision of the U.S. economy for a generation, a lot of people are now saying, it ain't necessarily so. The current deep recession has provoked new demands that America revive its manufacturing sector. The critics say the U.S. must start making things again, especially in a world where other nations are using the notion of a global economy exclusively for their own advantage.”

Peter Navarro, Professor of Economics, University of California at Irvine

“I mean, let's try to first understand why it's important to have manufacturing jobs in America. It's really for two reasons. One is that they have what we call in Economics a bigger multiplier effect, which is to say that one manufacturing job creates more jobs down the line than a service sector job. And then, more importantly, manufacturing jobs on average pay more. So if you basically want a vibrant, healthy economy over the long term in America, you need manufacturing kind of as your core to generate the jobs, generate the income for people to consume and perpetuate economic growth. So that's basically why we need that. It's basically why China, for example, right now is the only country in the world that's experiencing robust economic growth. It's basically taken over the manufacturing factory floor of the world. Now the other thing I think that's important to understand about the argument is that there's a big misconception that the reason why America had to give away its manufacturing base to the rest of the world was because of cheap labor elsewhere. And, in fact, the research I've done over the last ten years indicates that while cheap labor plays a role in this globalization phenomenon, certainly, a lot of what's going on, particularly in China, is driven by simply unfair trade practices designed to beggar the American economy.”

Where I grew up in California, beside farming, there was aerospace companies that built the rockets for the moon program, aircraft factories, automobile plants (Ford and GM), shipyards that built and maintained ships, as well as countless other industrial…steel mills, lumber mills, etc. They are all, except one, gone now.

If we don’t focus on taking care of ourselves, who will??

Friday, July 16, 2010

Banana Republic of USA by Barry Obama

It was plain for any semi-serious political junkie that Karl Rove was Bush’s brain…Rove would spout off, and Bush would embrace it. Hence Bush embraced a lot of just wrongheaded ideas, like the Iraq war. Don’t get me wrong here-Saddam was a sonofabitch that deserved to be booted out on humanitarian grounds…but the neo-cons clearly held sway in the instigation of the war there.

Just as plainly to me, when Obama was campaigning, and I was rooting for anyone but him to win the nomination, was the fact that his team, led my Axelrod and company were not selling ideas as much as selling hyperbole, empty and devoid of any real substance….they were telling people about Hope and Change, feeding off the dissatisfaction of the masses.

ü  You need health care, and I will give it to you.

ü  Your kids need world class education, from kindergarten to college degree…I will give it to them

ü  America is hated, I will make us loved again

Blah blah blah, typical political bs I have heard my whole life.

I believed it when I was 18, I doubted it when I was in my 30’s, and I call it total BS now.

What has he delivered? Many people think he saved us from financial ruin; I say he has only delayed its reckoning, maybe made it worse.

I wrote yesterday that he could have spread the nearly trillion dollars of the stimulus to all persons who paid taxes, and we could have spent the money on all sorts of stuff…paying off bills, savings, buying a lot of stuff we really don’t need, but want anyway…the opportunities are there, and certainly would have be consistent with prior government follies…

But instead he worked to save jobs…[BS ALERT - Saved Jobs? ] We still have 10% unemployment, well California is 12%.

National HealthCare- good idea, wrong implementation- more bureaucrats, more agencies, more stuff to screw up-I don’t trust the government to do a good job on this at all, since they failed to address tort reform, cost containment, drug costs, etc. So the lawyers, insurance companies and drug companies make out and we still pay, either in premiums, taxes or both….and probably won’t see any better healthcare delivery. Most people polled now think this was a bad idea (Ya think?)

Credit card reform?  All I know is now on my bills they say how many decades it will take to pay off my cards at the minimum, and that they will not automatically cover any overdrafts, like they used to. OH and they raised the interest rates before the law went into effect and in some cases either reduced credit lines or just closed the account.

I had a visa with a $5,000 credit line, with a balance of $200. They reduced the credit line to $500. Another raised the interest from 7.5% to 11%. A third wrote me and said we are closing your account because you have too much credit access…HUH?  

 

General Motors is now controlled by the government and the UAW, while Chrysler is a UAW Fiat venture. GM would like to start selling stock again, but not until the Obamaistas decide  what the Governments stake will be…my assumption is they want to retain control, unlike when Chrysler was bailed out in 1979.

Back then, under President Jimmy Carter, the government made a deal based on the same arguments made this time around…without help, we’ll go out of business, and hundreds of thousands will be laid off..

Congress required Chrysler to obtain private financing for $1.5 billion -- the government was co-signing the note, not printing the money -- and to obtain another $2 billion in "commitments or concessions [that] can be arranged by Chrysler for the financing of its operations." One of those options, of course, was reduce employees’ wages; in prior discussions, the union had failed to budge, but the contingent guarantee moved the union.

Chrysler repaid all the money by 1983, and the US Treasury collected an additional $350 million in fees

But back then Obama was a kid in the Punahou School in Hawaii…yeah, young Barry was a mere lad when the last financial meltdown of America happened…

Moving forward, Obama will likely continue to do what he does, and rule as though he has a mandate from the people, the chosen leader of the free world. Barry is about to get “beyatch” slapped by reality in November.

Once single party rule comes to an end, we might see some of this lunacy stop…

I really wish we moved beyond two party rule… it would be fun watching 3 or 5 parties try to work things out…

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Loathing the President- Or is he el comandante Obama?

Stimulus...nearly a trillion dollars, and 3.5 million "saved" jobs??? $285,714 per job.

You could have done better spreading that money around to all the taxpayers in form of tax rebate, and let us either save or spend the money, about $6500 each...

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is blasting the Obama administration and congressional Democrats for policies it says are expanding government and hindering an economic recovery.

The powerful business lobby group said Democrats and the White House have “neglected America’s number one priority” — creating jobs.

“Instead of continuing their partnership with the business community and embracing proven ideas for job creation, they vilified industries while embarking on an ill-advised course of government expansion, major tax increases, massive deficits, and job-destroying regulations,” the chamber wrote in an open letter to President Obama and lawmakers.

Nationalized auto industry...GM is essentially UAW/Government Motors, and Chrysler is quasi US Government, Fiat, and UAW...only Ford is really independent any more.

Health care - 2/3 of the country says they don't like it, and would like it either partially or totally repealed...

55% of Americans think socialist fits Obama...Bank and Financial Regulation Reform, Immigration Reform, allowing voter intimidation...whats next?

Fairness Doctrine? (By By Free Speech)

Federal Firearms Control Regulation reform (aka gun ban - by by means to defend the constitution, home and hearth)

I hope not. I pray not. I will vote in November a pure anti-obama ticket, for my family, for my community, for my country.

Stop el Comandante, or America becomes Venezuela Norte

 

 

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Secure The Border - Support Arizona

Arizona has become the superhighway for illegal border crossings and drug trafficking in the United States.  With the rise of kidnappings, home invasions, drug seizures and human smuggling, illegal immigration in Arizona is no longer about just those looking for a better life.  The consequences of Washington’s failed security policies are felt daily in Arizona – not only in crime, but in harm to our natural desert landscape.  Read the Arizona/Mexico Border Update - Special Report

Consider the Facts

  • In 2008, The U.S. Justice Department said recently that Mexican gangs are the "biggest organized crime threat to the United States."
  • Until January of 2009, any smugglers carrying under the threshold of 500 pounds were often not prosecuted.  Smugglers began purposely carrying smaller loads or coming in just below 500 pounds to try to escape prosecution.
  • In 2009, Phoenix had more than 370 kidnapping cases last year, turning it into the kidnapping capital of the U.S. Most of the victims were illegal aliens or linked to the drugs trade.
  • Narcotics prosecutions in Arizona have risen 202% in 16 months and that is still not handling all of the arrests that are made according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.
  • 1,080 prosecutions will be refused this year in Tucson sector alone.  This represents over one third of all un prosecuted cases in the Southwest. 
  • According to Phoenix Police Department, there have already been 95 home invasion robberies in 2010, following 398 in 2009 and 376 in 2008.
  • An estimated 5 to 10 % of all marijuana produced in Mexico is transported by highly organized and compartmentalized Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations each year through the Tohono O’odham Reservation, which accounts for less than 4% percent of the U.S.-Mexico Border. Source: National Drug Threat Assessment 2010


Read the letters from Governor Brewer to Washington that were never answered.

 

 

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Stupid People - Ignorance meets lack of thought

Reading my friends blog entry (http://midnight124.multiply.com/journal/item/13/Stupid_Neighbors?replies_read=10)

reminded me of a event several years ago.

 I was recently married, and had taken a job as a school bus driver.

On one particular road, I needed to pull over at the bus stop designated by the Highway Patrol, kill the engine, park the bus, turn on the flashing RED STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS lights (which also causes a Stop sign to flip out on the side of bus) carefully assist the kids (ages 5-10) to the front of the bus, walk across the street with my STOP sign in hand, wearing my bright fluorescent orange vest, listen for any traffic,  then walk back, get the kids and walk them across the street. More than once I did this routine and at the part I was about to walk the kids across, I would here the sound of a large engine accelerating up the hill towards the curve around which we were at.

This woman would come flying up the hill, rain, snow, whatever, and fly by me and the kids in her GM truck without even acknowledging the large yellow vehicle with flashing lights. The last time she did this, I was in the street with a boy about 6, who i had to grab and carry off the roadway, feeling the wind of the vehicle blow against us as we lunged for safety. Reporting these incident had done nothing, so I told the dispatcher i was going to quit if the highway Patrol wasn't going to do something. The next day, the designated Highway Patrol officer showed up at the stop, parking behind the bus. He was with me when here she comes, flying up the road again....only this time Officer Dan is in the road, waving her over.  She blew by him. Bad move. I have never seen a 50 something-year- old -close -to-retirement officer run so fast, and start his car so quickly.  

The next day, she came flying up the road, and stopped.  

 As I crossed the road with the kids, she glared at me, and when I walked back, she gave me the finger. "I got a f ing ticket because of YOU"  I screamed back "The person in the mirror got you that ticket"

Moral of the story: Some people are ignorant of the law; some know the law and just act stupidly. Most who are ignorant and are informed, alter their behavior accordingly. Stupid people don't. People can either be ignorant or stupid. Its pretty difficult to be both, but some try.

Monday, July 12, 2010

Article urges citizens to give up modernity for "simpler life"

I read an article, commentary really, that said we should eschew the comforts of modern life for the sake of the planet. Walk, ride a bike, take a train or bus, but for God’s sake don’t drive. Dress for hot weather in summer and cool/cold in winter, and leave the ac turned up and the heater setting low…go outside at night in summer, and leave the plasma TV off.

All good ideas   

The tenor of the article though was a bit off to me. The author made assumptions that people would begin to bond with all the free time away from TV, children would flourish since they would be forced to play outside, given that the TV and associated video gaming consoles would be disabled, childhood obesity would disappear, neighborhoods would once again be “like the old days”, where we cared about each other, actually knew each other. Utopia is at hand!

Nice. Nice dream. What I think main stream media journalist in big cities tend to forget is the rest of the country. People like me that live in a semi-rural area on the outskirts of town, or like my brother who has a small ranch in the mountains, where he typically gets snowed in 2-8 times a year. 

Many of you are, like me, using a form of broadband internet, either DSL by the local phone company, or perhaps via a cable company. Some use dial-up…and probably not because they want to.

See, where I live, people in the city have the option for Wi-Fi, DSL, and all sorts of connections, while out here in Podunk, we begged for even low bandwidth DSL for years…seriously, I have had DSL for the last 6 years, after the phone company decided too many of my neighbors were opting for cable or satellite (see, the free market does work). Our recent big upgrade means I can actually watch video on my computer! Did you know that! Video…dang, what will they think of next…lol

And living here where the temp in summer routinely exceeds 100F, and stays in the 90-100 range from June thru October or early November, air conditioning is a real blessing. And we  try to keep out humble home a comfortable 80…our ceiling fans do most of the cooling…

Transportation by car has greatly expanded the ability of people here about  to get to town, which was not always an easy task. And I am not talking about 100 years ago either. The bridge that connects us to town was built in 1987; before that, it was a farm road that came to a two lane crossing that flooded in winter, meaning a 20 mile detour to get to the highway, and then another 18 to town.

Out here in Podunk we got fancy plasma HDTV because the gubment changed the broadcast standard, and we decided to trade up. Still have a tube TV or 2 in the house, since cable decided to go up in price (and service didn't’t improve) so we switched to satellite TV, and the tuner boxes work fine…yup, here in Podunk, we like our modern conveniences.

Being able to get to town in only half an hour summer or winter, watching TV while the cooling night air slowly goes from 100 to 80, being able to sleep without being sweaty…yup, guess we won’t do what that author said.

I am not going to apologize for trying to live comfortable. Not wasteful, just comfortable.. I already dress seasonal, have to. We walk to the grocery down the road, or the sandwich shop nearby; we do walk over to the farmers market on Sunday to get vegetables and fruit. So stop beating up on us.

Now, can I go back to drinking my solar brewed ice tea?

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Have we forgotten?

Does anyone remember July 7?

I am sitting here wondering what went on this week that I forgot, something significant. Not my dog’s birthday, which is today, nor America’s birthday a week ago..hmm

I type the phrase “history July 7” and get things like History -Events-Birth dates

 

And then I type July 7, 2005, “London's transit system is bombed by terrorists, 56 deaths, 700 injured”

The War on Terror visited London.

I wonder who else in this country remembered.

It’s like we are all sleep walking, the memories of 9/11 and other attacks since then blending into a blur of time passing. 

I have a newspaper front page of 9/11 on the wall in our house. I didn't forget, will never forget. 

Yet many who voiced those same sentiments have now had a softening of their views, pacified by changes in syntax as the War on Terror becomes Overseas Contingency Operations, knowledge that an massive attack of the 9/11 scope has not happened again.

And then here it is 2010 and the Attorney General of the United States of America refused to blame "radical Islam" for terrorism.  Others in the administration clarified that, pointing out that “ the administration would not "describe our enemy as 'jihadists' or 'Islamists' because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or ones community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children."

Forgetting that the terrorists are motivated by a (in my view seriously flawed) religious zealotry, has led this government to release many gentle people wrongly swept up in the search for enemies.

Gentle people like 30-year-old Saudi national [Qahtani], who was arrested two weeks ago, had been in contact with Al-Qaeda number two Ayman al-Zawahiri... Qahtani, who adopted the nom de guerre "Sinan al-Saudi," held a degree in business administration and also graduated from King Fahd Security College with the rank of lieutenant.

He entered Iraq in 2004, shortly after the US-led invasion to oust Saddam Hussein, and was involved in operations in the towns of Al-Qaim and Husayba near Iraq's border with Syria.

Abdullah Azzam Saleh Misfar al-Qahtani was apprehended by the US military in 2007 under the false name Muzawar al-Shammari, and was released last year.

More recently, he participated in the planning of a series of co-ordinated attacks against Baghdad hotels in January which killed 36 people, and in the organization of five vehicle-borne bombs that killed 127 people in the capital in December.

He was arrested by Iraqi Security Forces before he could set in motion his biggest plan yet, attacking the World Cup in South Africa.

He was released from Guantanamo bay under orders from the Obama administration in 2009. insufficient cause to continue ot hold or detain...

Thanks to the outstanding leadership of President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, the line distinguishing warfare from law enforcement has been thoroughly eradicated.   The inevitable outcome -- demonstrated by this, the latest in a series of close calls -- is guaranteed to be toxic to the civil society.

The war on terror is no game.  These people intend to kill us in large numbers, and unless we take that seriously, they will succeed.  It’s not the same as using the exclusionary rule to return a burglar to the streets rather than offend tender sensibilities because someone filled out a warrant incorrectly.  Al-Qaeda is not the Gambino crime family, and a law-enforcement approach will not defeat them.

To my friends and family serving  - Hooah and Semper Fi

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Wit, Humor and online conversation

You ever use a word in conversation and wonder what it means, according to the dictionary, or its origins? I do. One such word is the witty. What constitutes wit, and how do you know its witty?

I found this online - "Being witty is a good way to use your intelligence and knowledge to amuse people. It can also be an impressive flirting tool! But be warned, if the person you're having a conversation with isn't grasping your wittiness, you might come off as a snob, or just plain weird."

OK, I'll admit it...the part that says "...you might come off as a snob, or just plain weird.." hit home.

Most of the people I work with have never referred to me as a snob, but they do believe I am weird. Mostly because I tend to be what I call honest and they call " blunt, earnest, frank, " or other terms..

The two i work the most with told me after I had worked with them for a few months that they thought I was presumptuous, in that I rebuffed their offers to teach me everything they do, so i would understand it. My approach was to observe and question what they were doing, and develop my own thoughts on how things might be done, since I was hired to improve operations, hence I was going to re-engineer things a bit.

The bluntness comes from what others have called my confrontational nature, which makes me laugh. I am not confrontational, but I don't back away from something because someone else disagrees.

Back to wit- I don't think i have any.

Aristotle said "Wit is educated insolence" 

If that's the case, maybe I have wit. I am educated, and my father used to say I was insolent...hmmmmm

 

Update on the January 2007 Burgalry

Our home was burglarized in January 2007, and after i replaced my computer, i wrote the following:

 "I have not been posting to this blog like i should, and resolved to do better in 2007. Well, one week into the new year, persons unknown smashed in the window to my family room, and managed to steal my LCD TV, ALL THREE laptop computers, money that was for going out, and jewelry. Oh, and the safe that had our pistols in it. Yes, they took the safe outside and got into it, scattering contents everywhere and then took what they wanted. Not to mention the chaos they left in the house. "

The TV was recovered about a year later, during a search of a man wanted for questioning for a homicide. It had been destroyed in the arrest, as evidenced by the boot print on the screen, so it was junked.

A revolver was maybe recovered during the investigation of a fire of a crack house, but the serial number had been obliterated, and the gun chromed, so no proof positive there...they also recovered a check cashing card in my name, which i had never heard of before..

Then this week we were informed a semi automatic my husband had bought me, a really nice firearm, which was brand new back in 2007 was recovered at the scene of a murder in the East Bay area...it was the presumed murder weapon, so the police said we would probably never see it again, and honey said thats fine, just melt it down, I dont want it.

All these things were insured, so while we were out some money, we managed to replace a lot of stuff...

The idea that "our stuff" was taken was bad enough, but that these seem to have sold it to other thugs really disturbs me, which seems irrational. Mostly I want the people that did it to get caught. And punished. Severely...

Sorry, sort of my anger rant...

Update:

 I looked last night for hours to find a news story thast matched the date range, location and circumstance as described to me by the police about the firearm they recovered.

Some thugs broke into a house at 4:30 am, were confronted by the homeowner and his girlfriend; shot them both, injuries not fatal, home owner wrestles with shooter, takes gun away, shoots thug, killing him. Woman calls police, who find homeowner hold bad guy at gun point, other thug dead, and third thug escapes, bleeding. Police dog locates bleeding thug. Thugs charged with murder, since they were in act of felony and California law says if you are a criminal committing a crime and your co-criminal gets killed, YOU get tagged for it. Homeowner not cheged, DA says self defense.

Homeowner and girlfriend recovering.

Why did you bomb my inbox? (or what happens when you import blogs from another site)

Several of you have complained in a very nice way that I bombarded you inbox with updates...some of you were resentful, others wonder why the sudden flurry of blogs.

I have been closing various other sites i used to blog on, and moving them all to Multiply, or deleting them. I have stuff I wrote five years ago now all posted here on Multiply...Still, I should have been thinking about how that shows up in your inbox, which didn't happen..

The import function in Multiply allows you to import from places like Blogger, etc, by using your login (you enter it) to provide access, and then grabs the content and dumps it enmass to the Multiply site. If I do import more, I will try to see if it can be done selectively, so as not to bomb you with updates.

You can also just set a inbox filter to limit what you see...and when.

Thanks to those of you that made me aware this is an issue,...

Friday, July 9, 2010

Go ahead, don't stop by to read or say anything, just move alone..er, along

It might seem like a strange topic to write about – but the reality is that all blogs, lose readers from time to time.

Usually the readers just silently disappear – you might not have even known that you had them so losing them goes unnoticed – however occasionally you hear about it either with the reader sending you an email.

Losing Readers Sucks

Whether it happens silently or in a public way – losing readers sucks. Not only that – many bloggers take it personally and get quite depressed about it. Like me…

A few thoughts on how to lose readers well:

1. Don’t let it Impact your Self Worth

Losing readers = failure in the eyes of many bloggers.

Your worth as a blogger and as a person does not come from what you achieve or what others think about you – if you fall for looking at life this way you’re in for a fall at some point or another.

2. Listen to Critique

The key is to attempt to strip back some of the negative stuff and try to take an objective look at the core of what they’re saying. This is far from easy to do, particularly when the person leaving your blog as a reader does so publicly and unfairly- however there have been a couple of times when I’ve learned important lessons from these types of interactions.

3. Open a Conversation but Don’t Get Into Mud Slinging

One of the hardest things to decide when someone else writes anything negative about you is whether to engage with them in conversation – and whether to do it publicly or privately.

My approach is to try to engage with the person writing about me – but to only do it to a point that is constructive. If the person is not willing to engage or has their own agendas behind it and is not willing to be constructive I don’t engage them any further.

On whether to do it privately or publicly – again it comes down to whether it is going to be constructive. For example if the person has said untruths about you or has said things that can be cleared up with some clarification – I generally try to reply with a comment that politely clears up the errors in what they’ve said so that others coming across the post have a chance to get the full story.

This has not always been greeted with civility.

4. Acknowledge a Reader Life Cycle

One of the most important lessons that I’ve learned over the last 7 years of blogging is that it is rare to have a reader stay with you forever. Readers move on for a variety of reasons and many of them have nothing to do with you or your blog:

  • Some readers leave because they have zero interest in your topic
  • Some readers leave because they don’t have time to read
  • Some readers leave because of their level of knowledge on a topic 
  • The list goes on – readers will come and go.

5. A lesson from a Buddhist monk

 “When someone attacks you with anger and hatred say to them:

“Thank you for your ‘gift’ – but I think you can keep it for yourself.”

It is easy to take on the anger of other people and to wear it as a burden of your own but it is usually unhealthy to do so. “

Life is too short to get drawn into the anger and bitterness of others.

Bottom of Form